Skip to content
Docs
English
Esc
navigateopen⌘Jpreview
On this page

Assessment formats

Choose the right Fuxam exam-type submission format and rating mode for written exams, oral exams, presentations, term papers, projects, portfolios, and practical assessments.

Universities describe assessments in many everyday labels — Klausur, oral exam, presentation, term paper, project, portfolio, practical. In FuxamCMS, those labels become exam types: a submission format plus a rating mode, duration, scheduling, and attempt workflow. This chapter is a catalog for examination offices and curriculum planners who need to pick the right template without inventing a new one for every module title.

Why it matters

Examination regulations rarely say “file upload.” They say written exam, oral examination, or practical demonstration. Mapping those domain formats onto a small, governed catalog of exam types:

  • Keeps My Exams filters and module planning readable
  • Prevents one mega-template from mixing incompatible attempt workflows
  • Makes grading controls predictable for examiners
  • Supports ECTS and transcript reporting with the right scale choice

Create templates under Create an exam type. Configure scales under Configure grading scale.

How it fits

Layer Question it answers
Domain format What does the Prüfungsordnung call this assessment?
Submission type How do students deliver work in Fuxam?
Rating mode Graded, pass/fail, or participation?
Module requirement Where the type is attached; may include weight and final-exam flags
Live exam What staff open in My Exams

Key terms

Term Meaning
Submission format The exam type Type field: file upload, exam, digital exam, presentation, or custom form
Rating mode How the result is recorded: Graded, Pass or fail, or Participation
Summative Counts toward module completion / transcript (typical Exam Center use)
Formative Learning feedback; often stays in teaching tools unless regulations require Exam Center tracking

Catalog — domain format to Fuxam template

The rows below are strategy guidance: map your regulation wording to documented Fuxam mechanics. Exact names and durations belong in your institutional catalog.

Written exam (Klausur)

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Timed, invigilated knowledge or skills test; often the main module exam
Suggested Type Exam or Digital exam (if delivered online)
Suggested rating mode Usually Graded with a German 1.0–5.0 or percentage schema
Duration Set length in minutes on the exam type
Scheduling Often deadline- or appointment-based depending on exam office practice
Watch for Pass boundary at 4.0 on German scales; points-to-grade conversion — see Configure grading scale

Oral exam

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Spoken examination with examiners; protocol-driven
Suggested Type Presentation (duration-based) or Custom form when you need a fixed protocol sheet
Suggested rating mode Graded (numeric or letter) or Pass or fail if the regulation is binary
Duration Common for presentation-type templates
Extras Topic confirmation settings when students must agree a topic before the sitting
Watch for Pair a custom form for examiner criteria; rating mode still records the outcome

Presentation

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Talk, defense, or performance assessed in a timed slot
Suggested Type Presentation
Suggested rating mode Graded when differentiated marks are required; Pass or fail for competence gates
Scheduling Appointment-based scheduling often fits presentation slots
Watch for Alternative assessment requests if students may need another format

Term paper (Hausarbeit)

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Extended written work submitted by a deadline
Suggested Type File upload
Suggested rating mode Usually Graded
Scheduling Deadline-based is typical
Watch for Attempt workflow must match resit rules for written coursework

Project

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Applied individual or group project with deliverables
Suggested Type File upload (artifacts) and/or Custom form (structured reflection)
Suggested rating mode Graded for scored projects; Pass or fail for milestone gates
Watch for Weight percentage on the module requirement when the project is only part of the module grade

Portfolio

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Collection of evidence over time
Suggested Type File upload (compiled portfolio) or Custom form (structured sections)
Suggested rating mode Graded or Pass or fail per regulation; some institutions treat intermediate check-ins as Participation
Watch for Do not overload one form — prefer focused forms; see Custom exam forms

Practical (lab, clinical, workshop)

Aspect Guidance
Typical purpose Demonstrated skill, safety competence, or workshop performance
Suggested Type Exam / Presentation for observed practicals; Custom form for checklists; File upload for lab reports
Suggested rating mode Pass or fail for safety/competence gates; Graded when a differentiated mark is required; Participation for attendance-only practicals — see Participation and ungraded completion
Watch for Binary modes do not use rating schemas

Quick comparison

Domain format Common Type Common rating mode Schema needed?
Written Klausur Exam / Digital exam Graded Yes
Oral exam Presentation / Custom form Graded or Pass or fail Only if Graded
Presentation Presentation Graded or Pass or fail Only if Graded
Term paper File upload Graded Yes
Project File upload / Custom form Graded or Pass or fail Only if Graded
Portfolio File upload / Custom form Graded, Pass or fail, or Participation Only if Graded
Practical Varies Pass or fail / Participation / Graded Only if Graded

Choosing rating mode with the format

If the regulation says… Prefer
German numeric grade, letter grade, or ECTS A–F Graded + matching rating schema
“Bestanden / nicht bestanden” only Pass or fail
Proof of attendance or engagement, no mark Participation
Scored exam with bonus points or unusual rounding Still Graded — handle conversion and rounding policy via schemas and ruleset rounding

Best practices

  • One template per regulatory pattern — same format and same rating mode and same attempt workflow.
  • Name for humans — for example “Written exam — graded — auto reattempt”, not an opaque code.
  • Separate binary gates from graded finals — a pass/fail lab safety check and a graded Klausur should usually be two types.
  • Document formative vs summative intent — keep pure teaching quizzes out of Exam Center unless the assessment must appear in My Exams.
  • Plan custom forms before custom-form typesCustom exam forms.

Common pitfalls

  • Choosing File upload for every written assessment when a timed Exam type better matches invigilated Klausur logistics.
  • Using Graded for a regulation that only allows pass/fail — graders then expect a schema that policy never intended.
  • Creating parallel types that differ only by cosmetic name — staff cannot tell which to attach to modules.
  • Ignoring topic-confirmation needs for presentations and thesis-style assessments.

FAQ

Is an oral exam always a Presentation type?

Not necessarily. Use Presentation when duration and appointment-style delivery fit. Use Custom form when the priority is a structured examiner protocol. The rating mode is independent of that choice.

Can one module have both a practical pass/fail and a graded written exam?

Yes — as separate examination requirements, each with its own exam type. Keep attempt workflows compatible across types on that module.

Where do ECTS credits fit in this catalog?

ECTS credits describe workload in curriculum and module planning. ECTS grades (A–F) are achievement labels you model in rating schemas for Graded types. Do not confuse the two.

Last updated on July 20, 2026

Was this page helpful?